Filtered by vendor Redhat Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Subscriptions
Total 571 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2015-0226 2 Apache, Redhat 7 Wss4j, Jboss Amq, Jboss Data Grid and 4 more 2025-04-20 N/A
Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.0.x before 2.0.2 improperly leaks information about decryption failures when decrypting an encrypted key or message data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover the plaintext form of a symmetric key via a series of crafted messages. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-2487.
CVE-2017-9788 6 Apache, Apple, Debian and 3 more 18 Http Server, Mac Os X, Debian Linux and 15 more 2025-04-20 N/A
In Apache httpd before 2.2.34 and 2.4.x before 2.4.27, the value placeholder in [Proxy-]Authorization headers of type 'Digest' was not initialized or reset before or between successive key=value assignments by mod_auth_digest. Providing an initial key with no '=' assignment could reflect the stale value of uninitialized pool memory used by the prior request, leading to leakage of potentially confidential information, and a segfault in other cases resulting in denial of service.
CVE-2017-7561 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-20 N/A
Red Hat JBoss EAP version 3.0.7 through before 4.0.0.Beta1 is vulnerable to a server-side cache poisoning or CORS requests in the JAX-RS component resulting in a moderate impact.
CVE-2016-8610 7 Debian, Fujitsu, Netapp and 4 more 55 Debian Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 52 more 2025-04-20 7.5 High
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
CVE-2017-3163 2 Apache, Redhat 2 Solr, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-20 N/A
When using the Index Replication feature, Apache Solr nodes can pull index files from a master/leader node using an HTTP API which accepts a file name. However, Solr before 5.5.4 and 6.x before 6.4.1 did not validate the file name, hence it was possible to craft a special request involving path traversal, leaving any file readable to the Solr server process exposed. Solr servers protected and restricted by firewall rules and/or authentication would not be at risk since only trusted clients and users would gain direct HTTP access.
CVE-2017-5664 2 Apache, Redhat 4 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more 2025-04-20 N/A
The error page mechanism of the Java Servlet Specification requires that, when an error occurs and an error page is configured for the error that occurred, the original request and response are forwarded to the error page. This means that the request is presented to the error page with the original HTTP method. If the error page is a static file, expected behaviour is to serve content of the file as if processing a GET request, regardless of the actual HTTP method. The Default Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M20, 8.5.0 to 8.5.14, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.43 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.77 did not do this. Depending on the original request this could lead to unexpected and undesirable results for static error pages including, if the DefaultServlet is configured to permit writes, the replacement or removal of the custom error page. Notes for other user provided error pages: (1) Unless explicitly coded otherwise, JSPs ignore the HTTP method. JSPs used as error pages must must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method. (2) By default, the response generated by a Servlet does depend on the HTTP method. Custom Servlets used as error pages must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method.
CVE-2016-6311 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-20 N/A
Get requests in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7 disclose internal IP addresses to remote attackers.
CVE-2017-12629 4 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 1 more 9 Solr, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 6 more 2025-04-20 9.8 Critical
Remote code execution occurs in Apache Solr before 7.1 with Apache Lucene before 7.1 by exploiting XXE in conjunction with use of a Config API add-listener command to reach the RunExecutableListener class. Elasticsearch, although it uses Lucene, is NOT vulnerable to this. Note that the XML external entity expansion vulnerability occurs in the XML Query Parser which is available, by default, for any query request with parameters deftype=xmlparser and can be exploited to upload malicious data to the /upload request handler or as Blind XXE using ftp wrapper in order to read arbitrary local files from the Solr server. Note also that the second vulnerability relates to remote code execution using the RunExecutableListener available on all affected versions of Solr.
CVE-2016-5018 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more 16 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 13 more 2025-04-20 9.1 Critical
In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 a malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications.
CVE-2017-6056 3 Canonical, Debian, Redhat 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-20 N/A
It was discovered that a programming error in the processing of HTTPS requests in the Apache Tomcat servlet and JSP engine may result in denial of service via an infinite loop. The denial of service is easily achievable as a consequence of backporting a CVE-2016-6816 fix but not backporting the fix for Tomcat bug 57544. Distributions affected by this backporting issue include Debian (before 7.0.56-3+deb8u8 and 8.0.14-1+deb8u7 in jessie) and Ubuntu.
CVE-2017-7504 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-20 N/A
HTTPServerILServlet.java in JMS over HTTP Invocation Layer of the JbossMQ implementation, which is enabled by default in Red Hat Jboss Application Server <= Jboss 4.X does not restrict the classes for which it performs deserialization, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data.
CVE-2016-6816 2 Apache, Redhat 4 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more 2025-04-20 N/A
The code in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.6, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.38, 7.0.0 to 7.0.72, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.47 that parsed the HTTP request line permitted invalid characters. This could be exploited, in conjunction with a proxy that also permitted the invalid characters but with a different interpretation, to inject data into the HTTP response. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack and/or obtain sensitive information from requests other then their own.
CVE-2015-6644 2 Google, Redhat 6 Android, Jboss Amq, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more 2025-04-12 N/A
Bouncy Castle in Android before 5.1.1 LMY49F and 6.0 before 2016-01-01 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted application, aka internal bug 24106146.
CVE-2014-3623 2 Apache, Redhat 8 Cxf, Wss4j, Jboss Amq and 5 more 2025-04-12 N/A
Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does not properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2014-3510 2 Openssl, Redhat 5 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The ssl3_send_client_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote DTLS servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and client application crash) via a crafted handshake message in conjunction with a (1) anonymous DH or (2) anonymous ECDH ciphersuite.
CVE-2014-3570 2 Openssl, Redhat 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The BN_sqr implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not properly calculate the square of a BIGNUM value, which might make it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors, related to crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, and crypto/bn/bn_asm.c.
CVE-2015-0254 3 Apache, Canonical, Redhat 5 Standard Taglibs, Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux and 2 more 2025-04-12 N/A
Apache Standard Taglibs before 1.2.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or conduct external XML entity (XXE) attacks via a crafted XSLT extension in a (1) <x:parse> or (2) <x:transform> JSTL XML tag.
CVE-2015-0298 1 Redhat 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Server, Mod Cluster 2025-04-12 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the manager web interface in mod_cluster before 1.3.2.Alpha1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted MCMP message.
CVE-2015-6254 2 Picketlink, Redhat 2 Picketlink, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2025-04-12 6.3 Medium
The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.
CVE-2016-2141 1 Redhat 11 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Data Virtualization and 8 more 2025-04-12 9.8 Critical
It was found that JGroups did not require necessary headers for encrypt and auth protocols from new nodes joining the cluster. An attacker could use this flaw to bypass security restrictions, and use this vulnerability to send and receive messages within the cluster, leading to information disclosure, message spoofing, or further possible attacks.