Total
8504 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-11022 | 2025-12-09 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Personal Project Panilux allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This CSRF vulnerability resulting in Command Injection has been identified. This issue affects Panilux: before v.0.10.0. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and responded that they deny ownership of the mentioned product. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66629 | 1 Hedgedoc | 1 Hedgedoc | 2025-12-09 | 3.7 Low |
| HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30901 | 1 Siemens | 2 Q200, Q200 Firmware | 2025-12-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9182 | 1 Zzzcms | 1 Zzzphp | 2025-12-09 | N/A |
| There is a CSRF in ZZZCMS zzzphp V1.6.1 via a /admin015/save.php?act=editfile request. It allows PHP code injection by providing a filename in the file parameter, and providing file content in the filetext parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42616 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2025-12-09 | N/A |
| Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data, configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks: an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their authenticated session. Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent or awareness. The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13629 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Landing Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'wplp_api_update_text' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13621 | 2 Teamdream, Wordpress | 2 Dream Gallery, Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 6.1 Medium |
| The dream gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'dreampluginsmain' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27195 | 2025-12-08 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sandi Verdev Watermark RELOADED allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Watermark RELOADED: from n/a through 1.3.5. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4889 | 1 Xibosignage | 1 Xibo | 2025-12-08 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in index.php in Digital Signage Xibo 1.4.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a new administrator via the AddUser action or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by CVE-2013-4888. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6670 | 1 Wso2 | 19 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Enterprise Integrator and 16 more | 2025-12-08 | 8.8 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to the use of the HTTP GET method for state-changing operations within admin services, specifically in the event processor of the Carbon console. Although the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is used as a mitigation, it is ineffective in this context because it allows cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigations using GET requests. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link, leading the browser to issue unintended state-changing requests. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized operations such as data modification, account changes, or other administrative actions. According to WSO2 Secure Production Guidelines, exposure of Carbon console services to untrusted networks is discouraged, which may reduce the impact in properly secured deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45538 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Diskstation Manager Unified Controller | 2025-12-05 | 9.6 Critical |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebAPI Framework in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-2 and 7.2.2-72806 and Synology Unified Controller (DSMUC) before 3.1.4-23079 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53684 | 1 Socomec | 2 Diris M-70, Diris M-70 Firmware | 2025-12-05 | 7.5 High |
| A cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability exists in the WEBVIEW-M functionality of Socomec DIRIS Digiware M-70 1.6.9. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to unauthorized access. An attacker can stage a malicious webpage to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13684 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The ARK Related Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ark_rp_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12373 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12130 | 2 Wcvendors, Wordpress | 2 Woocommerce Multi-vendor, Woocommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors, Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the /vendor_dashboard/product/delete/ endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete vendor products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12879 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 8.8 High |
| The User Generator and Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the "Import Using CSV File" function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate user privileges by creating arbitrary accounts with administrator privileges via a forged request, provided they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1000137 | 1 Scilico | 1 I\, Librarian | 2025-12-05 | 8.8 High |
| I, Librarian version 4.8 and earlier contains a Cross site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in users.php that can result in the password of the admin being forced to be changed without the administrator's knowledge. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11759 | 2 Watchful, Wordpress | 2 Xcloner, Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Backup, Restore and Migrate your sites with XCloner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Xcloner_Remote_Storage:save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add or modify an FTP backup configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to set an attacker-controlled FTP site for backup storage and exfiltrate potentially sensitive site data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13362 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Norby AI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13144 | 2 Contentstudio, Wordpress | 2 Contentstudio, Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| The ContentStudio plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.7. This is due to missing or insufficient nonce validation on the add_cstu_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||