Total
2113 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-29972 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Azure Storage Resouce Provider, Azure Storage Resource Provider | 2026-02-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure Storage Resource Provider allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53767 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Azure, Azure Open-ai, Azure Openai | 2026-02-26 | 10 Critical |
| Azure OpenAI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-20371 | 1 Splunk | 3 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.0.1, 9.4.4, 9.3.6 and 9.2.8, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.109, 9.3.2408.119 and 9.2.2406.122, an unauthenticated attacker could trigger a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) potentially letting an attacker perform REST API calls on behalf of an authenticated high-privileged user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61884 | 1 Oracle | 1 Configurator | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Runtime UI). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Configurator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Configurator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2025-59503 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Azure, Azure Compute Resource Provider | 2026-02-26 | 10 Critical |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure Compute Gallery allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62207 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Azure Monitor, Azure Monitor Control Service | 2026-02-26 | 8.6 High |
| Azure Monitor Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-64663 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Azure Cognitive Service For Language, Azure Language | 2026-02-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Custom Question Answering Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-27696 | 2 Dgtlmoon, Webtechnologies | 2 Changedetection.io, Changedetection | 2026-02-26 | 8.6 High |
| changedetection.io is a free open source web page change detection tool. In versions prior to 0.54.1, changedetection.io is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) because the URL validation function `is_safe_valid_url()` does not validate the resolved IP address of watch URLs against private, loopback, or link-local address ranges. An authenticated user (or any user when no password is configured, which is the default) can add a watch for internal network URLs. The application fetches these URLs server-side, stores the response content, and makes it viewable through the web UI — enabling full data exfiltration from internal services. Version 0.54.1 contains a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25545 | 2 Astro, Withastro | 2 \@astrojs\/node, Astro | 2026-02-26 | 8.6 High |
| Astro is a web framework. Prior to version 9.5.4, Server-Side Rendered pages that return an error with a prerendered custom error page (eg. `404.astro` or `500.astro`) are vulnerable to SSRF. If the `Host:` header is changed to an attacker's server, it will be fetched on `/500.html` and they can redirect this to any internal URL to read the response body through the first request. An attacker who can access the application without `Host:` header validation (eg. through finding the origin IP behind a proxy, or just by default) can fetch their own server to redirect to any internal IP. With this they can fetch cloud metadata IPs and interact with services in the internal network or localhost. For this to be vulnerable, a common feature needs to be used, with direct access to the server (no proxies). Version 9.5.4 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2479 | 2 Dfactory, Wordpress | 2 Responsive Lightbox & Gallery, Wordpress | 2026-02-26 | 5 Medium |
| The Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.1. This is due to the use of `strpos()` for substring-based hostname validation instead of strict host comparison in the `ajax_upload_image()` function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25738 | 2 Cern, Indico | 2 Indico, Indico | 2026-02-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| Indico is an event management system that uses Flask-Multipass, a multi-backend authentication system for Flask. Versions prior to 3.3.10 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery. Indico makes outgoing requests to user-provides URLs in various places. This is mostly intentional and part of Indico's functionality but is never intended to let users access "special" targets such as localhost or cloud metadata endpoints. Users should upgrade to version 3.3.10 to receive a patch. Those who do not have IPs that expose sensitive data without authentication (typically because they do not host Indico on AWS) are not affected. Only event organizers can access endpoints where SSRF could be used to actually see the data returned by such a request. For those who trust their event organizers, the risk is also very limited. For additional security, both before and after patching, one may also use the common proxy-related environment variables (in particular `http_proxy` and `https_proxy`) to force outgoing requests to go through a proxy that limits requests in whatever way you deem useful/necessary. These environment variables would need to be set both on the indico-uwsgi and indico-celery services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27170 | 1 Opensift | 1 Opensift | 2026-02-25 | 7.1 High |
| OpenSift is an AI study tool that sifts through large datasets using semantic search and generative AI. In versions 1.1.2-alpha and below, URL ingest allows overly permissive server-side fetch behavior and can be coerced into requesting unsafe targets. Potential access/probing of private/local network resources from the OpenSift host process when ingesting attacker-controlled URLs. This issue has been fixed in version 1.1.3-alpha. To workaround when using trusted local-only exceptions, use OPENSIFT_ALLOW_PRIVATE_URLS=true with caution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3163 | 2 Remyandrade, Sourcecodester | 2 Website Link Extractor, Website Link Extractor | 2026-02-25 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Website Link Extractor 1.0. This vulnerability affects the function file_get_contents of the component URL Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41704 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Batik, Debian Linux, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2026-02-25 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to run untrusted Java code from an SVG. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics prior to 1.16. It is recommended to update to version 1.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3026 | 2 Erzhongxmu, Jeewms | 2 Jeewms, Jeewms | 2026-02-25 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in erzhongxmu JEEWMS 3.7. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /plug-in/ueditor/jsp/getRemoteImage.jsp of the component UEditor. The manipulation of the argument upfile leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23803 | 2 Burhan Nasir, Wordpress | 2 Smart Auto Upload Images, Wordpress | 2026-02-24 | 6.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Burhan Nasir Smart Auto Upload Images smart-auto-upload-images allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Smart Auto Upload Images: from n/a through <= 1.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69299 | 2 Laborator, Wordpress | 2 Oxygen, Wordpress | 2026-02-24 | 7.2 High |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Laborator Oxygen oxygen allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Oxygen: from n/a through <= 6.0.8. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0528 | 1 Transloadit | 1 Uppy | 2026-02-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository transloadit/uppy prior to 3.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9862 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2026-02-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ghost allows an attacker to access internal resources.This issue affects Ghost: from 6.0.0 through 6.0.8, from 5.99.0 through 5.130.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27479 | 2 Ellite, Wallosapp | 2 Wallos, Wallos | 2026-02-24 | 7.7 High |
| Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. Versions 4.6.0 and below contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the subscription and payment logo/icon upload functionality. The application validates the IP address of the provided URL before making the request, but allows HTTP redirects (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = true), enabling an attacker to bypass the IP validation and access internal resources, including cloud instance metadata endpoints. The getLogoFromUrl() function validates the URL by resolving the hostname and checking if the resulting IP is in a private or reserved range using FILTER_FLAG_NO_PRIV_RANGE | FILTER_FLAG_NO_RES_RANGE. However, the subsequent cURL request is configured with CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = true and CURLOPT_MAXREDIRS = 3, which means the request will follow HTTP redirects without re-validating the destination IP. This issue has been fixed in version 4.6.1. | ||||