Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Struts
Subscriptions
Total
92 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1181 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 3 Struts, Banking Platform, Portal | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ActionServlet.java in Apache Struts 1 1.x through 1.3.10 mishandles multithreaded access to an ActionForm instance, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (unexpected memory access) via a multipart request, a related issue to CVE-2015-0899. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1182 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ActionServlet.java in Apache Struts 1 1.x through 1.3.10 does not properly restrict the Validator configuration, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or cause a denial of service via crafted input, a related issue to CVE-2015-0899. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3093 | 2 Apache, Ognl Project | 2 Struts, Ognl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.24.1 does not properly cache method references when used with OGNL before 3.0.12, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (block access to a web site) via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4431 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct redirection attacks by leveraging a default method. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4433 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct redirection attacks via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3081 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 2 Struts, Siebel E-billing | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0114 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Commons Beanutils, Struts, Amq Broker and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Commons BeanUtils, as distributed in lib/commons-beanutils-1.8.0.jar in Apache Struts 1.x through 1.3.10 and in other products requiring commons-beanutils through 1.9.2, does not suppress the class property, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via the class parameter, as demonstrated by the passing of this parameter to the getClass method of the ActionForm object in Struts 1. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0094 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.16.2 allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader via the class parameter, which is passed to the getClass method. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0785 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.28 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a "%{}" sequence in a tag attribute, aka forced double OGNL evaluation. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0112 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Struts, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ParametersInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20 does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3087 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to an ! (exclamation mark) operator to the REST Plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3082 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| XSLTResult in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.20.2, 2.3.24.x before 2.3.24.2, and 2.3.28.x before 2.3.28.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the stylesheet location parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4436 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2 before 2.3.29 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors related to improper action name clean up. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4430 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 mishandles token validation, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2014-7809 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.x before 2.3.20 uses predictable <s:token/> values, which allows remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4465 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The URLValidator class in Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 and 2.5.x before 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a null value for a URL field. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4003 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the URLDecoder function in JRE before 1.8, as used in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.28, when using a single byte page encoding, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via multi-byte characters in a url-encoded parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2162 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.25 does not sanitize text in the Locale object constructed by I18NInterceptor, which might allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors involving language display. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1831 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The default exclude patterns (excludeParams) in Apache Struts 2.3.20 allow remote attackers to "compromise internal state of an application" via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0113 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| CookieInterceptor in Apache Struts before 2.3.20, when a wildcard cookiesName value is used, does not properly restrict access to the getClass method, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-0094. | ||||