Total
8883 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-49920 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Apache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation. As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user's consent. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected | ||||
| CVE-2023-49655 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Matlab | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins MATLAB Plugin 2.11.0 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins parse an XML file from the Jenkins controller file system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0480 | 1 Vitalpbx | 1 Vitalpbx | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| VitalPBX version 3.2.3-8 allows an unauthenticated external attacker to obtain the instance administrator's account. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4047 | 3 Debian, Mozilla, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Firefox, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| A bug in popup notifications delay calculation could have made it possible for an attacker to trick a user into granting permissions. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 116, Firefox ESR < 102.14, and Firefox ESR < 115.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32344 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2025-02-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.4, and 12.0.0 is vulnerable to form action hijacking where it is possible to modify the form action to reference an arbitrary path. IBM X-Force ID: 255898. | ||||
| CVE-2021-26296 | 2 Apache, Netapp | 2 Myfaces, Oncommand Insight | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| In the default configuration, Apache MyFaces Core versions 2.2.0 to 2.2.13, 2.3.0 to 2.3.7, 2.3-next-M1 to 2.3-next-M4, and 3.0.0-RC1 use cryptographically weak implicit and explicit cross-site request forgery (CSRF) tokens. Due to that limitation, it is possible (although difficult) for an attacker to calculate a future CSRF token value and to use that value to trick a user into executing unwanted actions on an application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36669 | 1 Idccms Project | 1 Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/type_deal.php?mudi=add. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36668 | 1 Idccms Project | 1 Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/type_deal.php?mudi=del | ||||
| CVE-2024-36667 | 1 Idccms Project | 1 Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/idcProType_deal.php?mudi=add&nohrefStr=close | ||||
| CVE-2024-36550 | 1 Idccms | 1 Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /admin/vpsCompany_deal.php?mudi=add&nohrefStr=close | ||||
| CVE-2024-36549 | 1 Idccms | 1 Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /admin/vpsCompany_deal.php?mudi=rev&nohrefStr=close | ||||
| CVE-2024-36548 | 2 Idccms, Idccms Project | 2 Idccms, Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via admin/vpsCompany_deal.php?mudi=del | ||||
| CVE-2024-36547 | 1 Idccms | 1 Idccms | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| idccms V1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component admin/vpsClass_deal.php?mudi=add | ||||
| CVE-2024-13683 | 1 Sperse | 1 Automate Hub | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Automate Hub Free by Sperse.IO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'automate_hub' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update an activation status via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27968 | 1 Optimole | 1 Super Page Cache | 2025-02-12 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Optimole Super Page Cache for Cloudflare allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Super Page Cache for Cloudflare: from n/a through 4.7.5. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2552 | 1 Bumsys Project | 1 Bumsys | 2025-02-12 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository unilogies/bumsys prior to 2.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4426 | 1 Comparisonslider | 1 Comparison Slider | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Comparison Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions hooked to AJAX actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change slider titles, delete sliders and modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3943 | 1 Delower | 1 Wp To Do | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_addcomment function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add comments to to do items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3945 | 1 Delower | 1 Wp To Do | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add new todo items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3947 | 1 Delower | 1 Wp To Do | 2025-02-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||