Total
2475 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13706 | 1 Tencent | 1 Patrickstar | 2025-12-30 | N/A |
| Tencent PatrickStar merge_checkpoint Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Tencent PatrickStar. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the merge_checkpoint endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-27182. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62703 | 2 Fugue-project, Fugue Project | 2 Fugue, Fugue | 2025-12-30 | 8.8 High |
| Fugue is a unified interface for distributed computing that lets users execute Python, Pandas, and SQL code on Spark, Dask, and Ray with minimal rewrites. In version 0.9.2 and prior, there is a remote code execution vulnerability by pickle deserialization via FlaskRPCServer. The Fugue framework implements an RPC server system for distributed computing operations. In the core functionality of the RPC server implementation, I found that the _decode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py directly uses cloudpickle.loads() to deserialize data without any sanitization. This creates a remote code execution vulnerability when malicious pickle data is processed by the RPC server. The vulnerability exists in the RPC communication mechanism where the client can send arbitrary serialized Python objects that will be deserialized on the server side, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine. This issue has been patched via commit 6f25326. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1432 | 1 Iperov | 1 Deepfacelab | 2025-12-30 | 5 Medium |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability was found in DeepFaceLab pretrained DF.wf.288res.384.92.72.22 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function apply_xseg of the file main.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-253391. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15117 | 1 Dromara | 1 Sa-token | 2025-12-29 | 3.1 Low |
| A weakness has been identified in Dromara Sa-Token up to 1.44.0. This affects the function ObjectInputStream.readObject of the file SaJdkSerializer.java. Executing manipulation can lead to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14922 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Diffusers | 2025-12-29 | 7.8 High |
| Hugging Face Diffusers CogView4 Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Hugging Face Diffusers. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of checkpoints. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27424. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14931 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Smolagents | 2025-12-29 | N/A |
| Hugging Face smolagents Remote Python Executor Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Hugging Face smolagents. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of pickle data. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-28312. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13715 | 1 Tencent | 1 Facedetection-dsfd | 2025-12-29 | N/A |
| Tencent FaceDetection-DSFD resnet Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Tencent FaceDetection-DSFD. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resnet endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-27197. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14925 | 1 Huggingface | 1 Accelerate | 2025-12-29 | 7.8 High |
| Hugging Face Accelerate Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Hugging Face Accelerate. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of checkpoints. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-27985. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13467 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Keycloak | 2025-12-23 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak LDAP User Federation provider. This vulnerability allows an authenticated realm administrator to trigger deserialization of untrusted Java objects via a malicious LDAP server configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9083 | 2 Ninjaforms, Wordpress | 2 Ninja Forms, Wordpress | 2025-12-23 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Ninja Forms WordPress plugin before 3.11.1 unserializes user input via form field, which could allow Unauthenticated users to perform PHP Object Injection when a suitable gadget is present on the blog. | ||||
| CVE-2017-20206 | 2 Wordpress, Wpmudev | 2 Wordpress, Appointments | 2025-12-23 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Appointments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in versions up to, and including, 2.2.1 via deserialization of untrusted input from the `wpmudev_appointments` cookie. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. Attackers were actively exploiting this vulnerability with the WP_Theme() class to create backdoors. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65035 | 1 Pluginsglpi | 1 Databaseinventory | 2025-12-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| pluginsGLPI's Database Inventory Plugin "manages" the Teclib' inventory agents in order to perform an inventory of the databases present on the workstation. Prior to version 1.1.2, in certain conditions (database write access must first be obtained through another vulnerability or misconfiguration), user-controlled data is stored insecurely in the database via computergroup, and is later unserialized on every page load, allowing arbitrary PHP object instantiation. Version 1.1.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2017-20208 | 3 Metagauss, Registrationmagic, Wordpress | 3 Registrationmagic, Registrationmagic, Wordpress | 2025-12-19 | 9.8 Critical |
| The RegistrationMagic – Custom Registration Forms, User Registration, Payment, and User Login plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to 3.7.9.3 (exclusive) via deserialization of untrusted input from the is_expired_by_date() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. The additional presence of a POP chain allows attackers to fetch a remote file and install it on the site. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10068 | 1 Kentico | 1 Xperience | 2025-12-19 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Kentico 12.0.x before 12.0.15, 11.0.x before 11.0.48, 10.0.x before 10.0.52, and 9.x versions. Due to a failure to validate security headers, it was possible for a specially crafted request to the staging service to bypass the initial authentication and proceed to deserialize user-controlled .NET object input. This deserialization then led to unauthenticated remote code execution on the server where the Kentico instance was hosted. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29499 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 2 Glib, Enterprise Linux | 2025-12-18 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GLib. GVariant deserialization fails to validate that the input conforms to the expected format, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35249 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Dynamics 365 Business Central, Dynamics 365 Business Central 2023, Dynamics 365 Business Central 2024 | 2025-12-17 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-66214 | 1 Wearefrank | 1 Ladybug | 2025-12-17 | 7 High |
| Ladybug adds message-based debugging, unit, system, and regression testing to Java applications. Versions prior to 3.0-20251107.114628 contain the APIs /iaf/ladybug/api/report/{storage} and /iaf/ladybug/api/report/upload, which allow uploading gzip-compressed XML files with user-controllable content. The system deserializes these XML files, enabling attackers to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by submitting carefully crafted XML payloads and thereby gain access to the target server. This issue is fixed in version 3.0-20251107.114628. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1856 | 1 Progress | 1 Telerik Reporting | 2025-12-16 | 8.5 High |
| In Progress® Telerik® Reporting versions prior to 2024 Q1 (18.0.24.130), a code execution attack is possible by a remote threat actor through an insecure deserialization vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1801 | 1 Progress | 1 Telerik Reporting | 2025-12-16 | 7.7 High |
| In Progress® Telerik® Reporting versions prior to 2024 Q1 (18.0.24.130), a code execution attack is possible by a local threat actor through an insecure deserialization vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14476 | 2 Unitecms, Wordpress | 2 Doubly, Wordpress | 2025-12-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Doubly – Cross Domain Copy Paste for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.46 via deserialization of untrusted input from the content.txt file within uploaded ZIP archives. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. The additional presence of a POP chain allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, delete files, retrieve sensitive data, or perform other actions depending on the available gadgets. This is only exploitable by subscribers, when administrators have explicitly enabled that access. | ||||