Total
2475 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13787 | 2 Easycorp, Zentao | 2 Zentao, Zentao | 2025-12-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in ZenTao up to 21.7.6-8564. The affected element is the function file::delete of the file module/file/control.php of the component File Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument fileID can lead to improper privilege management. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 21.7.7 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0358 | 2 Debian, Tuxera | 2 Debian Linux, Ntfs-3g | 2025-12-04 | 7.8 High |
| Jann Horn of Google Project Zero discovered that NTFS-3G, a read-write NTFS driver for FUSE, does not scrub the environment before executing modprobe with elevated privileges. A local user can take advantage of this flaw for local root privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11561 | 1 Redhat | 9 Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 6 more | 2025-12-03 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the integration of Active Directory and the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD) on Linux systems. In default configurations, the Kerberos local authentication plugin (sssd_krb5_localauth_plugin) is enabled, but a fallback to the an2ln plugin is possible. This fallback allows an attacker with permission to modify certain AD attributes (such as userPrincipalName or samAccountName) to impersonate privileged users, potentially resulting in unauthorized access or privilege escalation on domain-joined Linux hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40548 | 2 Microsoft, Solarwinds | 2 Windows, Serv-u | 2025-12-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| A missing validation process exists in Serv U when abused, could give a malicious actor with access to admin privileges the ability to execute code. This issue requires administrative privileges to abuse. On Windows deployments, the risk is scored as a medium because services frequently run under less-privileged service accounts by default. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8489 | 2 Kingaddons, Wordpress | 2 King Addons For Elementor, Wordpress | 2025-12-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| The King Addons for Elementor – Free Elements, Widgets, Templates, and Features for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions 24.12.92 to 51.1.14 . This is due to the plugin not properly restricting the roles that users can register with. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to register with administrator-level user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48982 | 2 Microsoft, Veeam | 4 Windows, Agent, Veeam and 1 more | 2025-12-01 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability in Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows allows for Local Privilege Escalation if a system administrator is tricked into restoring a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66266 | 1 Megatec | 1 Upsilon2000 | 2025-12-01 | N/A |
| The RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000 has insecure permissions, allowing the 'Everyone' group Full Control. A local attacker can replace the executable with a malicious binary to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or simply change the config path of the service to a command; starting and stopping the service to immediately achieve code execution and privilege escalation | ||||
| CVE-2025-66265 | 2 Megatec, Microsoft | 2 Upsilon2000, Windows | 2025-12-01 | N/A |
| CMService.exe creates the C:\\usr directory and subdirectories with insecure permissions, granting write access to all authenticated users. This allows attackers to replace configuration files (such as snmp.conf) or hijack DLLs to escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13680 | 2 Directorythemes, Wordpress | 2 Tiger, Wordpress | 2025-12-01 | 8.8 High |
| The Tiger theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 101.2.1. This is due to the plugin allowing a user to update the user role through the $user->set_role() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to elevate their privileges to that of an administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13540 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Tiare Membership plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to the 'tiare_membership_init_rest_api_register' function not restricting what user roles a user can register with. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to supply the 'administrator' role during registration and gain administrator access to the site. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13675 | 2 Directorythemes, Wordpress | 2 Tiger, Wordpress | 2025-12-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Tiger theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 101.2.1. This is due to the 'paypal-submit.php' file not restricting what user roles a user can register with. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to supply the 'administrator' role during registration and gain administrator access to the site. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66314 | 1 Zte | 1 Elasticnet Ume R32 | 2025-12-01 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in ZTE ElasticNet UME R32 on Linux allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects ElasticNet UME R32: ElasticNet_UME_R32_V16.23.20.04. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13538 | 2 Elated Themes, Wordpress | 2 Findall Listing, Wordpress | 2025-12-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| The FindAll Listing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to the 'findall_listing_user_registration_additional_params' function not restricting what user roles a user can register with. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to supply the 'administrator' role during registration and gain administrator access to the site. Note: The vulnerability can only be exploited if the FindAll Membership plugin is also activated, because user registration is in that plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20346 | 1 Cisco | 2 Catalyst Center, Digital Network Architecture Center | 2025-12-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Catalyst Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute operations that should require Administrator privileges. The attacker would need valid read-only user credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper role-based access control (RBAC). An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to an affected system and modifying certain policy configurations. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify policy configurations that are reserved for the Administrator role. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials for a user account with at least the role of Observer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34187 | 1 Ilevia | 3 Eve X1 Server, Eve X1 Server Firmware, Eve X5 Server | 2025-11-28 | 8.8 High |
| Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server version ≤ 4.7.18.0.eden contains a misconfiguration in the sudoers file that allows passwordless execution of certain Bash scripts. If these scripts are writable by web-facing users or accessible via command injection, attackers can replace them with malicious payloads. Execution with sudo grants full root access, resulting in remote privilege escalation and potential system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33187 | 1 Nvidia | 3 Dgx, Dgx Os, Dgx Spark | 2025-11-28 | 9.3 Critical |
| NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT, where an attacker could use privileged access to gain access to SoC protected areas. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, information disclosure, data tampering, denial of service, or escalation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33188 | 1 Nvidia | 3 Dgx, Dgx Os, Dgx Spark | 2025-11-28 | 8 High |
| NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in hardware resources where an attacker could tamper with hardware controls. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure, data tampering, or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24307 | 1 Intel | 2 Cip Software, Computing Improvement Program | 2025-11-26 | 2 Low |
| Improper privilege management for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data manipulation. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (low) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24838 | 1 Intel | 2 Cip Software, Computing Improvement Program | 2025-11-26 | 8.8 High |
| Improper privilege management for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24863 | 1 Intel | 2 Cip Software, Computing Improvement Program | 2025-11-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper privilege management for some Intel(R) CIP software before version WIN_DCA_2.4.0.11001 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an information disclosure. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||