Filtered by vendor Squid
Subscriptions
Total
41 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-1345 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5.STABLE9 and earlier does not trigger a fatal error when it identifies missing or invalid ACLs in the http_access configuration, which could lead to less restrictive ACLs than intended by the administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0173 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| squid_ldap_auth in Squid 2.5 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to bypass username-based Access Control Lists (ACLs) via a username with a space at the beginning or end, which is ignored by the LDAP server. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0174 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5 up to 2.5.STABLE7 allows remote attackers to poison the cache or conduct certain attacks via headers that do not follow the HTTP specification, including (1) multiple Content-Length headers, (2) carriage return (CR) characters that are not part of a CRLF pair, and (3) header names containing whitespace characters. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0175 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5 up to 2.5.STABLE7 allows remote attackers to poison the cache via an HTTP response splitting attack. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0446 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5.STABLE8 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain DNS responses regarding (1) Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDN) in fqdncache.c or (2) IP addresses in ipcache.c, which trigger an assertion failure. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1711 | 3 Clam Anti-virus, Gibraltar, Squid | 3 Clamav, Gibraltar Firewall, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Gibraltar Firewall 2.2 and earlier, when using the ClamAV update to 0.81 for Squid, uses a defunct ClamAV method to scan memory for viruses, which does not return an error code and prevents viruses from being detected. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3322 | 2 Squid, Suse | 2 Squid, Suse Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Squid on SUSE Linux 9.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via HTTPs (SSL). | ||||
| CVE-2005-3258 | 1 Squid | 1 Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The rfc1738_do_escape function in ftp.c for Squid 2.5 STABLE11 and earlier allows remote FTP servers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via certain "odd" responses. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2917 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5.STABLE10 and earlier, while performing NTLM authentication, does not properly handle certain request sequences, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon restart). | ||||
| CVE-2005-0718 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5.STABLE7 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) by aborting the connection during a (1) PUT or (2) POST request, which causes Squid to access previously freed memory. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1519 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5 STABLE9 and earlier, when the DNS client port is unfiltered and the environment does not prevent IP spoofing, allows remote attackers to spoof DNS lookups. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0194 | 1 Squid | 1 Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.5, when processing the configuration file, parses empty Access Control Lists (ACLs), including proxy_auth ACLs without defined auth schemes, in a way that effectively removes arguments, which could allow remote attackers to bypass intended ACLs if the administrator ignores the parser warnings. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2794 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| store.c in Squid 2.5.STABLE10 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain aborted requests that trigger an assert error related to STORE_PENDING. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0713 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 3 Enterprise Linux, Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflows in Squid before 2.4.STABLE6 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code (1) via the MSNT auth helper (msnt_auth) when using denyusers or allowusers files, (2) via the gopher client, or (3) via the FTP server directory listing parser when HTML output is generated. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0189 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 3 Enterprise Linux, Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The "%xx" URL decoding function in Squid 2.5STABLE4 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass url_regex ACLs via a URL with a NULL ("%00") character, which causes Squid to use only a portion of the requested URL when comparing it against the access control lists. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0843 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Linux, Squid Web Proxy | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid proxy server 2.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a mkdir-only FTP PUT request. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0067 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Squid 2.4 STABLE3 and earlier does not properly disable HTCP, even when "htcp_port 0" is specified in squid.conf, which could allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0714 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 3 Enterprise Linux, Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| FTP proxy in Squid before 2.4.STABLE6 does not compare the IP addresses of control and data connections with the FTP server, which allows remote attackers to bypass firewall rules or spoof FTP server responses. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0715 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 3 Enterprise Linux, Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in Squid before 2.4.STABLE6 related to proxy authentication credentials may allow remote web sites to obtain the user's proxy login and password. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0094 | 2 Redhat, Squid | 2 Enterprise Linux, Squid | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the gopherToHTML function in the Gopher reply parser for Squid 2.5.STABLE7 and earlier allows remote malicious Gopher servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted responses. | ||||