Filtered by vendor Djangoproject
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Django
Subscriptions
Total
128 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48432 | 2 Debian, Djangoproject | 2 Debian Linux, Django | 2025-10-15 | 4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27556 | 2 Djangoproject, Microsoft | 2 Django, Windows | 2025-10-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.8 and 5.0 before 5.0.14. The NFKC normalization is slow on Windows. As a consequence, django.contrib.auth.views.LoginView, django.contrib.auth.views.LogoutView, and django.views.i18n.set_language are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56374 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-10-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-26699 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 1 more | 2025-10-03 | 5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.7, 5.0 before 5.0.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.20. The django.utils.text.wrap() method and wordwrap template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32873 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). | ||||
| CVE-2024-53907 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 1 more | 2025-06-24 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. The strip_tags() method and striptags template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53908 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 2 Django, Ansible Automation Platform | 2025-06-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.) | ||||
| CVE-2021-45116 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Fedora, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-22 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41323 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-14 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7233 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Openstack, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7234 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12794 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for the technical 500 debug page. Given the right circumstances, this allowed a cross-site scripting attack. This vulnerability shouldn't affect most production sites since you shouldn't run with "DEBUG = True" (which makes this page accessible) in your production settings. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0222 | 2 Canonical, Djangoproject | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Django | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ModelMultipleChoiceField in Django 1.6.x before 1.6.10 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, when show_hidden_initial is set to True, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by submitting duplicate values, which triggers a large number of SQL queries. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0482 | 2 Djangoproject, Opensuse | 2 Django, Opensuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The contrib.auth.middleware.RemoteUserMiddleware middleware in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3, when using the contrib.auth.backends.RemoteUserBackend backend, allows remote authenticated users to hijack web sessions via vectors related to the REMOTE_USER header. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0473 | 3 Canonical, Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Django, Openstack | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The caching framework in Django before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2 reuses a cached CSRF token for all anonymous users, which allows remote attackers to bypass CSRF protections by reading the CSRF cookie for anonymous users. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0474 | 3 Canonical, Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Django, Openstack | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The (1) FilePathField, (2) GenericIPAddressField, and (3) IPAddressField model field classes in Django before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2 do not properly perform type conversion, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact and vectors, related to "MySQL typecasting." | ||||
| CVE-2015-0219 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Django before 1.4.18, 1.6.x before 1.6.10, and 1.7.x before 1.7.3 allows remote attackers to spoof WSGI headers by using an _ (underscore) character instead of a - (dash) character in an HTTP header, as demonstrated by an X-Auth_User header. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0220 | 2 Canonical, Djangoproject | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Django | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The django.util.http.is_safe_url function in Django before 1.4.18, 1.6.x before 1.6.10, and 1.7.x before 1.7.3 does not properly handle leading whitespaces, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted URL, related to redirect URLs, as demonstrated by a "\njavascript:" URL. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0483 | 2 Djangoproject, Opensuse | 2 Django, Opensuse | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The administrative interface (contrib.admin) in Django before 1.4.14, 1.5.x before 1.5.9, 1.6.x before 1.6.6, and 1.7 before release candidate 3 does not check if a field represents a relationship between models, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a to_field parameter in a popup action to an admin change form page, as demonstrated by a /admin/auth/user/?pop=1&t=password URI. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0472 | 3 Canonical, Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Django, Openstack | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The django.core.urlresolvers.reverse function in Django before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2 allows remote attackers to import and execute arbitrary Python modules by leveraging a view that constructs URLs using user input and a "dotted Python path." | ||||