Total
2878 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-1286 | 1 Mruby | 1 Mruby | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| heap-buffer-overflow in mrb_vm_exec in mruby/mruby in GitHub repository mruby/mruby prior to 3.2. Possible arbitrary code execution if being exploited. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1253 | 1 Struktur | 1 Libde265 | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository strukturag/libde265 prior to and including 1.0.8. The fix is established in commit 8e89fe0e175d2870c39486fdd09250b230ec10b8 but does not yet belong to an official release. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1244 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| heap-buffer-overflow in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.6.8. This vulnerability is capable of inducing denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1240 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap buffer overflow in libr/bin/format/mach0/mach0.c in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.8.6. If address sanitizer is disabled during the compiling, the program should executes into the `r_str_ncpy` function. Therefore I think it is very likely to be exploitable. For more general description of heap buffer overflow, see [CWE](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/122.html). | ||||
| CVE-2022-1160 | 2 Fedoraproject, Vim | 2 Fedora, Vim | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| heap buffer overflow in get_one_sourceline in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4647. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1061 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Heap Buffer Overflow in parseDragons in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.6.8. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1052 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Heap Buffer Overflow in iterate_chained_fixups in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.6.6. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0943 | 5 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow occurs in vim in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4563. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0714 | 4 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4436. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0713 | 2 Fedoraproject, Radare | 2 Fedora, Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.6.4. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0676 | 2 Fedoraproject, Radare | 2 Fedora, Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.6.4. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0631 | 1 Mruby | 1 Mruby | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Homebrew mruby prior to 3.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0570 | 1 Mruby | 1 Mruby | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Homebrew mruby prior to 3.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0518 | 2 Fedoraproject, Radare | 2 Fedora, Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.6.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0407 | 1 Vim | 1 Vim | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0318 | 4 Apple, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Macos, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow in vim/vim prior to 8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0213 | 2 Debian, Vim | 2 Debian Linux, Vim | 2024-11-21 | 6.6 Medium |
| vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow | ||||
| CVE-2022-0158 | 3 Apple, Fedoraproject, Vim | 3 Macos, Fedora, Vim | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 Low |
| vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow | ||||
| CVE-2021-4136 | 3 Apple, Fedoraproject, Vim | 4 Mac Os X, Macos, Fedora and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow | ||||
| CVE-2021-46790 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| ntfsck in NTFS-3G through 2021.8.22 has a heap-based buffer overflow involving buffer+512*3-2. NOTE: the upstream position is that ntfsck is deprecated; however, it is shipped by some Linux distributions. | ||||